Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933192Ab3CVLvW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:51:22 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:47994 "EHLO mail-vc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932640Ab3CVLvU (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:51:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1483775.d1txvSJx9o@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <2565053.YP0dCLmaW9@vostro.rjw.lan> <1483775.d1txvSJx9o@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:21:19 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5Ww6kl5gTS33VchCqip4pP86bHE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1364 Lines: 31 On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, March 22, 2013 07:50:54 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Hmm... I always thought fixups are way easy to review (and i still >> believe that's >> true) as they just contain what got changed and so people don't have to review >> whole patch again. > > They won't have to if you write in the preamble what the differences from > previous versions are. You didn't get me.. How will the reviewer check if author has done what he is saying in preamble and he hasn't broken anything new? >> BUT people who are looking for complete patches to apply >> would be annoyed by this and hence i always show them path of my repo >> where they can find it. > > The problem with this approach is that the complete patches never make it to > the mailing lists and people have problems with connecting commits to > previously posted patches. > > Moreover, it is *much* more convenient to me to take patches from kernel.org > patchwork than from your repos, with all due respect. I understand.. I push them to repo only when they are broken, otherwise not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/