Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753929Ab3CVMGB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:06:01 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:47278 "EHLO mail-oa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753465Ab3CVMF7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:05:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1790330.ctnB4S9NpK@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1483775.d1txvSJx9o@vostro.rjw.lan> <1790330.ctnB4S9NpK@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:35:59 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 914 Lines: 15 On 22 March 2013 17:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, if the submitter wants to cheat, she/he certainly can this way, but > what's the benefit, honestly? If the reviewer actually notices that there are > more differences than the submitter admits to, the consequences may be quite > unpleasant for the submitter (like the rejection of any future patches, for > example). And mistakes are possible anyway (and the more patches you deal > with, the greater the chances of making a mistake are). Agreed.. I was focusing on the last part: mistakes.. People learn over time and can still commit mistakes.. So a diff is always better to see what changed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/