Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:00:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:00:36 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-020-102.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.20.102]:21647 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:00:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:05:41 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Con Kolivas , References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1057 Lines: 28 On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > No Load: > > > Kernel Time CPU > > > 2.4.19 68.14 99% > > > 2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99% > > > 2.5.34 69.88 99% > > > 2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98% > > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99% > > > 2.4.19-cc 68.37 99% > > > 2.5.36 69.58 99% > > > > page_add/remove_rmap. Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too. > > Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in > Con's -rmap kernel ? ;) I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are getting close to statistically insignificant. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/