Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:18:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:18:28 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-020-102.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.20.102]:31887 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:18:28 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:23:33 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <20020919080602.2986.qmail@linuxmail.org> In-Reply-To: <20020919080602.2986.qmail@linuxmail.org> Cc: Andrew Morton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1061 Lines: 28 Just thought I'd bounce this one over to Andrew as a warm-n-fuzzy. There's also some kind of hint that preemption improves throughput here. On Thursday 19 September 2002 10:06, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > What I did: > Boot in single mode with apm off > ./chat_s 127.0.0.1 & > ./chat_c 127.0.0.1 30 1000 9999 > > And now the results: > 2.4.19-ck7.results:Average throughput : 55928 messages per second > 2.4.19.results:Average throughput : 44851 messages per second > 2.5.33.results:Average throughput : 59522 messages per second > 2.5.34.results:Average throughput : 62941 messages per second > 2.5.36.results:Average throughput : 60858 messages per second > > 2.4.19-ck7 is preemption ON > 2.5.33 and 2.5.34 are preemption ON > 2.5.36 is preemption OFF (Robert, 2.5.36 with preemption ON oops at boot) -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/