Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:27:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:27:14 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:59558 "HELO ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 04:27:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20020919083034.24458.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:30:34 +0800 Subject: Re: [chatroom benchmark version 1.0.1] Results X-Originating-Ip: 194.185.48.246 X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 854 Lines: 26 From: Daniel Phillips [...] > There's also some kind of hint that preemption improves throughput > here. I'm not so sure, but I'm not a developer, just looking to the number: > > 2.5.34.results:Average throughput : 62941 messages per second > > 2.5.36.results:Average throughput : 60858 messages per second 2.5.34 and 2.5.36 have more or less the same performances... (2.5.34 is preemption ON, 2.5.36 is OFF) There is an improovement in throughput in 2.5.3* against 2.4.*, and this is _good_ ;-) Ciao, Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/