Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:22:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:22:03 -0400 Received: from sphinx.mythic-beasts.com ([195.82.107.246]:43274 "EHLO sphinx.mythic-beasts.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:22:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:26:59 +0100 (BST) From: Matthew Kirkwood X-X-Sender: To: "Bond, Andrew" cc: Subject: Re: Linux TPC-C performance aided by kernel features In-Reply-To: <45B36A38D959B44CB032DA427A6E106402D09E36@cceexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 830 Lines: 20 On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bond, Andrew wrote: > 2. Large memory support (16GB) - The Oracle processes used about 14GB > of shared memory which was allocated using shmfs and managed through a > mapping window in the Oracle process space. Databases always love > more memory, however in an IA-32 architecture the gains definitely > diminish once you get past 4GB because of overhead. Our gains going > from 8GB to 16GB of memory in the system were in the 10% range. What did the gains from 4 to 8GB look like? Could going above 4GB be a performance loss on less busy systems? # Matthew. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/