Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:06:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:06:56 -0400 Received: from mailhost.tue.nl ([131.155.2.5]:5505 "EHLO mailhost.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:06:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:11:57 +0200 From: Andries Brouwer To: Ingo Molnar Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK Message-ID: <20020919131157.GA14938@win.tue.nl> References: <20020918211547.GA14657@win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 920 Lines: 25 On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:05:17AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andries Brouwer wrote: > > > > It doesn't sound like you read the patch at all. > > > > I looked at it and searched for base.c but didnt find it, > > so concluded that the real problem was not addressed. > > because, as mentioned before, that particular loop i fixed in 2.5.35. In that case, sorry for complaining about that part - I was looking at 2.5.33. But now that I look at patch-2.5.35 I don't see any improvement: for_each_task() is now called for_each_process(), but otherwise base.c is just as quadratic as it was. So, why do you think this problem has been fixed? Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/