Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754808Ab3CXVNn (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:13:43 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:33192 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754161Ab3CXVNl (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:13:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:13:37 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ian Lartey , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com, rob@landley.net, mturquette@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, wim@iguana.be, lgirdwood@gmail.com, gg@slimlogic.co.uk, j-keerthy@ti.com, ldewangan@nvidia.com, t-kristo@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/12] Palmas updates Message-ID: <20130324211336.GA18316@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1363964122-19201-1-git-send-email-ian@slimlogic.co.uk> <20130323060455.78a4c90c3f1e028434818fd1@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130323060455.78a4c90c3f1e028434818fd1@canb.auug.org.au> X-Cookie: Your aim is high and to the right. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2096 Lines: 50 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 06:04:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:55:10 +0000 Ian Lartey wrote: > > Patches based on linux-next-20130319 > I can't really comment on the patch set except to say that you should not > base on linux-next, you should base on the tree to which you expect the > patch set to be applied. It's fairly common to suggest to people working over lots of subsystems like this that they use -next since for most subsystems it contains the trees that should be submitted against and it's much more efficient. This works OK most of the time when people are posting patches as opposed to pull requests, though obviously cross tree issues do happen =66rom time to time. --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRT2xmAAoJELSic+t+oim9sQ8P/3zX1xNz3uTlq3HlnhSX79xf 7Iw6wgZ+1SILWpR1+FEfkCNjUuf9C4raa5DBVJM6VOqbldQENviWMrmojhi5y+Ts 2bCCuB/1+55C0W1WhNaAnmCtL6Yrg7RVlUr3zMLeETOWlmGc+TeNywzJMZdWCurs Z+DOMaZRG5AehOc1XZ0lZrGlP9QVSXTjKpGPVT65vS8Ttj9aNa7+U0X4tCVDRxsk ptN61dBPWXtx1PSaEiJ6IMgf8Gx7IBEtJFt1i3VgCGlFqgKrEq9oshsn1L4VwjG+ mWiRVf5lpDhfmxUO8yFq2IbF/nVTsAx4kp45J9IbdCTjwVh5AuF8/VIDDpTIlVdO ibotoXoeEF4qZe/UZSwkUhVq3Pv2/z1oSrG++N0Z1KAbrnUjCLymG50zfYY8cJXP g1Lu6iv89emD6nMdaA/mOCsFzX+eeuBuY+Cx5j8N+EbergNjxppx4JRnplXvbNOJ 7I/+VX1flt+pzwz6tpwwzvlSEA2yy1E5cPG9ER3tT8pwgioeR7bq6fd6V9mkiVc/ oPjgfQ/Wll4V78nSp1yQfvKoxqW/GOczrTSv4KcJFWU+X+xMf3NEUslHYZ0xjqHv yNlXBx0WCqnNxCf1v8X68eMqm55YV7VRkddVR7pLV5Wdo0O/wNBc1IqV4cueU1Ze zKqVHVWL6GlFwJbMJS8l =Zv8k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/