Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757976Ab3CYIyY (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:54:24 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:55048 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757706Ab3CYIyX (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 04:54:23 -0400 From: Michael Neuling To: Andi Kleen cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/29] x86, tsx: Add RTM intrinsics In-reply-to: <20130325081556.GS19692@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1364001923-10796-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1364001923-10796-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <30471.1364182834@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20130325081556.GS19692@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Comments: In-reply-to Andi Kleen message dated "Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:15:56 -0700." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.5; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:54:21 +1100 Message-ID: <15400.1364201661@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1573 Lines: 46 Andi Kleen wrote: > > FYI the TM spec can be downloaded here: > > https://www.power.org/documentation/power-isa-transactional-memory/ > > > > You're example code looks like this: > > I don't think portable code will use this directly. Note it's in arch/x86/ > > Generally portable code should use higher level interfaces, like > elide_lock/elide_lock_adapt that hide the architecture specific > details. > > If you want to do lock elision you would plug in some elision > algorithm that works well at that level. > > > Secondly, can we make xbegin just return true/false and get the status > > later if needed? > > I now removed xbegin() from the portable file, as it's only used > in arch specific code. OK, well most of my objections go away now. > And FWIW I'm considering to change it to save a few instructions and > go for the more efficient goto based interface in glibc. > > > > > ppc = tcheck... should be fine, other than the name. > > Well x and tm doesn't really matter, but I already have x* so i'm inclined > to keep it, unless people bikeshed too strongly. It should work for PPC too. Well if you're moving it out of generic code then it doesn't really matter anymore. Mikey > > BTW if the percpu include loop hell is ever sorted out _xtest may > even stop using XTEST. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/