Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:10:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:10:29 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.103]:61077 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:10:27 -0400 Message-ID: <3D8A141D.2080809@us.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:14:53 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE5.5; Windows 98; X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bond, Andrew" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TPC-C benchmark used standard RH kernel References: <45B36A38D959B44CB032DA427A6E106402D09E42@cceexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 21 Bond, Andrew wrote: > I believe I need to clarify my earlier posting about kernel features that > gave the benchmark a boost. The kernel that we used in the benchmark was an > unmodified Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1 kernel. We did tune the kernel via > standard user space tuning, but the kernel was not patched. HP, Red Hat, and > Oracle have worked closely together to make sure that the features I > mentioned were in the Advanced Server kernel "out of the box." Have you done much profiling of that kernel? I'm sure a lot of people would be very interested to see even readprofile results from a piece of the cluster during a TPC run. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/