Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758200Ab3CYOCE (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:02:04 -0400 Received: from shelob.surriel.com ([74.92.59.67]:48171 "EHLO shelob.surriel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757738Ab3CYOCC (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:02:02 -0400 Message-ID: <515058D5.6060509@surriel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:01:57 -0400 From: Rik van Riel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emmanuel Benisty CC: Linus Torvalds , Davidlohr Bueso , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , hhuang@redhat.com, "Low, Jason" , Michel Lespinasse , Larry Woodman , "Vinod, Chegu" Subject: Re: ipc,sem: sysv semaphore scalability References: <1363809337-29718-1-git-send-email-riel@surriel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 841 Lines: 24 On 03/25/2013 09:47 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> And you never see this problem without Rik's patches? > > No, never. > >> Could you bisect >> *which* patch it starts with? Are the first four ones ok (the moving >> of the locking around, but without the fine-grained ones), for >> example? > > With the first four patches only, I got some X server freeze (just tried once). Another random question, just to rule something out. What video driver are you using on your system? -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/