Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758553Ab3CYPsU (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:48:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:48681 "EHLO mail-pd0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758200Ab3CYPsS (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:48:18 -0400 Message-ID: <515071BE.4070007@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:48:14 -0700 From: Dirk Brandewie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Viresh Kumar , Dirk Brandewie , Maciej Rutecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] [CPUFREQ] 3.9.0-rcX References: <1965505.vyQ4xZcodg@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <1965505.vyQ4xZcodg@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1587 Lines: 46 On 03/24/2013 07:53 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, March 24, 2013 07:59:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 24 March 2013 19:41, Maciej Rutecki wrote: >>> (long e-mail, sorry ;-)) >> >> Don't be, it was useful :) >> >>> Last known good: 3.8.0 >>> >>> Short description: >>> 1. On -rc3, after s2ram cpufreq does not set CPU on max frequency on high >>> load (on battery). >> >> Try attached patch for this. >> >>> 2. On -rc4 (this is not real regression because I change config between -rc3 >>> and rc4), "ondemand" does not work. Current frequency is 'strange' (792 >>> MHz). >>> =============================================================================== >>> Kernel 3.9.0-rc4 >>> >>> CASE 7 >>> (normal boot) >>> cpu0/cpufreq//affected_cpus:0 >>> cpu0/cpufreq//related_cpus:0 >> >> This must be related to your different driver. > > Yes, intel_pstate is not really a cpufreq driver. It just overtakes the > whole subsystem. > > Dirk, can you please check if this is as intended? This is working as intended. The intel_pstate driver has the governor integrated into the scaling driver and does not use external governors. The reason the frequency is strange is because intel_pstate returns a measured value of the effective frequency that the core ran at during the last time it was sampled. --Dirk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/