Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933421Ab3CYVxi (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:53:38 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:18502 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933323Ab3CYVxh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:53:37 -0400 Message-ID: <5150C71A.3030802@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:52:26 -0400 From: Sasha Levin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130310 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Lespinasse CC: Rik van Riel , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davidlohr.bueso@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hhuang@redhat.com, jason.low2@hp.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, Dave Jones , benisty.e@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -next] ipc,sem: fix lockdep false positive References: <1363809337-29718-1-git-send-email-riel@surriel.com> <5150B1C2.8090607@oracle.com> <20130325163844.042a45ba@annuminas.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1280 Lines: 36 On 03/25/2013 05:42 PM, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: >> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:21:22 -0400 >> > Sasha Levin wrote: >> > >>> >> On 03/20/2013 03:55 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: >>>> >> > Include lkml in the CC: this time... *sigh* >>>> >> > ---8<--- >>>> >> > >>>> >> > This series makes the sysv semaphore code more scalable, >>>> >> > by reducing the time the semaphore lock is held, and making >>>> >> > the locking more scalable for semaphore arrays with multiple >>>> >> > semaphores. >>> >> >>> >> Hi Rik, >>> >> >>> >> I'm getting the following false positives from lockdep: >> > >> > Does this patch fix it? > I'll be surprised if it does, because we don't actually have single > depth nesting here... > Adding Peter & Ingo for advice about how to proceed > (the one solution I know would involve using arch_spin_lock() directly > to bypass the lockdep checks, but there's got to be a better way...) Yeah, it did not. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/