Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:20:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:20:21 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:32785 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 16:20:20 -0400 To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dank@kegel.com Subject: Re: Hardware limits on numbers of threads? References: <3D88208E.8545AAA2@kegel.com> <3D882500.2000105@redhat.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: 19 Sep 2002 11:36:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3D882500.2000105@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 794 Lines: 14 Ulrich Drepper writes: > This was and is true with the kernel before 2.5.3 when Ingo > introduced TLS support since the thread specific data had to be > addressed via LDT entries and the LDT holds at most 8192 entries. The > GDT based solution now implemented in the kernel has no such > limitation and the number of threads you can create with the new > thread library is only limited by system resources. It also was alwas incorrect for x86-64/64bit progreams, which do not use a LDT entry for each thread. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/