Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:20 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support for memory
 w/o backing pages
Message-ID: <20130326145020.GT9021@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
References: <1364303659-1951-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1364303659-1951-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1026
Lines: 23

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> When adding sg_page_iter I haven't thought properly through the use case
> for sg lists w/o backing pages - which is specific to the i915 driver -
> so this patchset adds support for this.
> 
> It applies on the i915 tree [1], where the iterator is in use already.
> 
> [1] git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel [nightly branch]

i915 patches are already included in linux-next, so should apply on top of
that, too. So can this go in through -mm for 3.10 or should I slurp it in
through drm-intel trees (once it passes review)? I'd like to ditch the
dummy page hack we're currently using (i.e. patch 2).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/