Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756147Ab3C0FQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:16:18 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:55574 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753732Ab3C0FQR (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:16:17 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v1.8.4 Message-ID: <5152807D.5010905@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:15:41 +0900 From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Minchan Kim CC: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Dan Magenheimer , Seth Jennings , Nitin Gupta , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Shaohua Li Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: remove swapcache page early References: <1364350932-12853-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1364350932-12853-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1356 Lines: 34 (2013/03/27 11:22), Minchan Kim wrote: > Swap subsystem does lazy swap slot free with expecting the page > would be swapped out again so we can't avoid unnecessary write. > > But the problem in in-memory swap is that it consumes memory space > until vm_swap_full(ie, used half of all of swap device) condition > meet. It could be bad if we use multiple swap device, small in-memory swap > and big storage swap or in-memory swap alone. > > This patch changes vm_swap_full logic slightly so it could free > swap slot early if the backed device is really fast. > For it, I used SWP_SOLIDSTATE but It might be controversial. > So let's add Ccing Shaohua and Hugh. > If it's a problem for SSD, I'd like to create new type SWP_INMEMORY > or something for z* family. > > Other problem is zram is block device so that it can set SWP_INMEMORY > or SWP_SOLIDSTATE easily(ie, actually, zram is already done) but > I have no idea to use it for frontswap. > > Any idea? > Another thinking....in what case, in what system configuration, vm_swap_full() should return false and delay swp_entry freeing ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/