Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 10:29:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 10:28:55 -0500 Received: from itaipu.nitnet.com.br ([200.255.111.241]:40711 "HELO itaipu.nitnet.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 10:28:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 12:58:14 -0200 To: Igmar Palsenberg Cc: James Morris , David Schwartz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TCP keepalive seems to send to only one port Message-ID: <20001225125814.A1154@flower.cesarb> In-Reply-To: <20001224002020.A2497@flower.cesarb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from maillist@chello.nl on Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 04:27:07PM +0100 From: Cesar Eduardo Barros Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > > Yeah. But I'm stuck with a NAT (which isn't mine, btw) which uses 2.1.xxx-2.2.x > > (according to nmap). Which had a default of 15 *minutes* (as I read in a HOWTO > > somewhere). I'm trying to convince the sysadmin to raise it to two hours, but I > > bet it'll be hard. > > ipchains -S timeoutval 0 0 is the only way to do this. > That's the easy part. Convincing the sysadmin (which probably is not very clueful) is the hard one. But this is getting too OT, EOT. -- Cesar Eduardo Barros cesarb@nitnet.com.br cesarb@dcc.ufrj.br - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/