Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753687Ab3C0PeU (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:34:20 -0400 Received: from r00tworld.com ([212.85.137.150]:35649 "EHLO r00tworld.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752683Ab3C0PeS (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:34:18 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2435 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:34:18 EDT From: "PaX Team" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, Luis Henriques Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:53:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER Reply-to: pageexec@freemail.hu CC: Emese Revfy , Al Viro , Oleg Nesterov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Serge Hallyn , Julien Tinnes , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Luis Henriques Message-ID: <515307E5.8858.4BC860B3@pageexec.freemail.hu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.12 (r00tworld.com [212.85.137.150]); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:53:29 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 25 sorry if you got this twice, had smtpd problems... On 26 Mar 2013 at 15:20, Luis Henriques wrote: > 3.5.7.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > ------------------ > > From: Andrew Morton > > commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a upstream. > > __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER is the preferred conditional for use in 3.9 and > later kernels, per Kees. does __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER exist in the 3.5 stable series at all? i thought it was new to 3.9... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/