Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:09 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        =?utf-8?B?0JjQstCw0LnQu9C+INCU0LjQvNC40YLRgNC+0LI=?= 
	<freemangordon@abv.bg>,
        linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
Message-ID: <20130327211208.GQ10155@atomide.com>
References: <517283541.62064.1362124023621.JavaMail.apache@mail81.abv.bg>
 <201303241526.59275@pali>
 <20130327205606.GN10155@atomide.com>
 <201303272205.17182@pali>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <201303272205.17182@pali>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1005
Lines: 29

* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [130327 14:09]:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [130324 07:31]:
> > > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
> > > RX-51?
> > 
> > I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
> > ARM.
> > 
> > AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
> > implementations. So the handler and passing of the parameters
> > seems like it should be generic.
> > 
> 
> Not only, look at freemangordon's email: 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/1/62

Seem like you may need some SoC specific wrapper to the
generic function to deal with the params. But still seems
like we can have an ARM generic smc funtion.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/