DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=smtp-out; d=abv.bg; c=simple; q=dns;
	b=hG+jVf1ZZ/+GJuL3F4TWrlVTEpBrmTX4WkE/a+N3tAuoHx4oV8r6qe6SggBln80hq
	Wh67PN37+wNlItvXDFlJFXax1W9LF0IRH3VXLU5iMmsoY29EfxF+DCdGvh4KgTZf612
	+7vrkSc1L0RN26YTJbSbRHoBXoB4B/TvI+inT4Y=
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:30:07 +0200 (EET)
From: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQstCw0LnQu9C+INCU0LjQvNC40YLRgNC+0LI=?= 
	<freemangordon@abv.bg>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, nm@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Message-ID: <24838523.73311.1364448607026.JavaMail.apache@mail82.abv.bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1688
Lines: 44

 Tony,

Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting #ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real piece of HW I have here is n900, so I just can't be sure the code will still work on the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how to proceed.

Regards,
Ivo

 >-------- Оригинално писмо --------
 >От:  Tony Lindgren 
 >Относно: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
 >До: Pali Rohár 
 >Изпратено на: Сряда, 2013, Март 27 23:12:09 EET
 >
 >
 >* Pali Rohár  [130327 14:09]:
 >> On Wednesday 27 March 2013 21:56:07 Tony Lindgren wrote:
 >> > * Pali Rohár  [130324 07:31]:
 >> > > it is possible to upstream errata 430973 workaround for
 >> > > RX-51?
 >> > 
 >> > I think we should make the SMC handling a generic function for
 >> > ARM.
 >> > 
 >> > AFAIK just the SMC call numbering is different for various
 >> > implementations. So the handler and passing of the parameters
 >> > seems like it should be generic.
 >> > 
 >> 
 >> Not only, look at freemangordon's email: 
 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/1/62
 >
 >Seem like you may need some SoC specific wrapper to the
 >generic function to deal with the params. But still seems
 >like we can have an ARM generic smc funtion.
 >
 >Regards,
 >
 >Tony
 >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/