Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:10:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:10:26 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:39951 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 08:10:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:15:25 +0100 From: Russell King To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] generic-pidhash-2.5.36-D4, BK-curr Message-ID: <20020920131525.A26646@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20020920122716.A2297@namesys.com> <20020920154347.A12399@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020920154347.A12399@namesys.com>; from green@namesys.com on Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 03:43:47PM +0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 25 On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 03:43:47PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > we need a cmpxchg() function in the generic library, using a spinlock. > > But this is not safe for arches that provides SMP but does not provide > cmpxchg in hadware, right? > I mean it is only safe to use such spinlock-based function if > all other places read and write this value via special functions that are > also taking this spinlock. Correct. > Do you think we can count on this? I don't think so. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/