Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:16:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:16:17 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:13067 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:16:17 -0400 Message-ID: <3D8B6722.8050707@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:21:22 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikita Danilov CC: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alexander Viro Subject: Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode() References: <3D8B4421.59392B30@digeo.com> <15755.19895.544309.44729@laputa.namesys.com> <3D8B5111.A318D63D@digeo.com> <15755.23491.712588.305582@laputa.namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 369 Lines: 11 You might ask the SGI guys what they do. I know that they have a systematic approach to documenting lock ordering. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/