Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:37:21 +0400
From: Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/video: lcd_get_level_current doen't return current
 level
Message-ID: <20130331103721.GA4369@thinkpad.lan>
References: <1364648501-5127-1-git-send-email-artem.savkov@gmail.com>
 <3fb82299-bdb9-4842-bd55-f3b87d2d789e@email.android.com>
 <20130331064619.GA11544@thinkpad.lan>
 <800799d9-f1ea-48ab-b565-4bd3ca230300@email.android.com>
 <20130331081600.GA4549@thinkpad.lan>
 <51580AFD.4000809@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51580AFD.4000809@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3093
Lines: 60

On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 06:07:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 03/31/2013 04:16 PM, Artem Savkov wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 09:04:21AM +0200, Danny Baumann wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com> schrieb:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 08:15:14AM +0200, Danny Baumann wrote:
> >>>>Artem Savkov <artem.savkov@gmail.com> schrieb:
> >>>>>acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current() called
> >>>>>acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level()
> >>>>>with "*level" as a second argument, resulting in level being
> >>>returned
> >>>>>based on
> >>>>>initial input, not current brightness, breaking backlight controls.
> >>>>I don't think this change is correct. As level was passed as
> >>>parameter into the evaluation of _BQC, *level contains the AML returned
> >>>brightness level afterwards, so it's correct to use it as an input to
> >>>acpi_video_bqc_value_to_level(). Actually, the whole point of
> >>>acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current() is to update
> >>>device->brightness->curr, so it doesn't make sense to me to use it in
> >>>that function.
> >>>>
> >>>>What's the exact problem this patch tries to solve?
> >>>
> >>>I'm running a -next kernel on my laptop and couple of days ago keyboard
> >>>backlight controls stopped working: only 2 lower brightness levels.
> >>>I've
> >>>debugged it a bit and found out that acpi_video_switch_brightness()
> >>>calls
> >>>acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current() with level uninitialized and
> >>>always gets lowest posible value.
> >>
> >>The point is: after the acpi_evaluate_object call, *level must contain the current brightness level, otherwise your BIOS is broken (this happens: e.g. my laptop always returns 100 from _BQC in Windows 8 mode). You can verify this easily by initializing level_current to some invalid value and checking it again after the call to _get_level_current. I'd be pretty surprised if the value didn't change. Also, if you look at [1], you'll see that the code operated on *level before as well.
> >>This problem may have been obscured by the fact that the brightness device wasn't initialized properly before my patches went in. Does acpi_video_switch_brightness actually do anything for you when reverting the 3 newest commits of video.c?
> >
> >Yes, you are right. Both my patch and the version before your patches
> >result in initial acpi_video_device_lcd_get_level_current call ending
> >with invalid level being returned and bqc disabled, so they both just
> >use *level = brightness->curr after that.
> >
> 
> OK, this suggests the _BQC control method of your system is broken.
> Please kindly file a bug in bugzilla.kernel.org, against
> ACPI/Power-Video and attach the output of acpidump and dmidecode there,
> I want to take a look, thanks.
> 
> -Aaron
> 

Submitted: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56011

-- 
Regards,
Artem
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/