Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:46:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:46:15 -0400 Received: from momus.sc.intel.com ([143.183.152.8]:44534 "EHLO momus.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:46:14 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Grover, Andrew" To: "'Jeff Garzik'" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: ACPI: Call for testers Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:50:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 976 Lines: 26 > From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com] > > If you're willing, please download the ACPI patch from here: > This patch get a number of rejects against 2.4.20-BK-current :( You're too smart for your own good. :) Yes, 2.4.20-BK-current will not patch cleanly. However, you can pull from http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-2.4-acpi for the patch against 2.4 bk current. > Also, posting the patch's real URL would be useful :) I can't stand > SourceForge's multiple levels of indirection, just to get to a file. > For other's, here's the 2.4.20-pre7 patch, without indirection: > http://unc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/acpi/acpi-20020918-2.4.20-pre7.dif f.gz Thanks, yes, that is a better URL. Regards -- Andy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/