Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758710Ab3DAPS6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:18:58 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:50433 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758471Ab3DAPS5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:18:57 -0400 Message-ID: <5159A559.4000808@canonical.com> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:18:49 -0400 From: Joseph Salisbury User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" CC: phaber@broadcom.com, arend@broadcom.com, pieterpg@broadcom.com, meuleman@broadcom.com, LKML , brudley@broadcom.com, frankyl@broadcom.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v3.8, v3.9] [Regression] brcmsmac: move PHY functions References: <5155F107.6050408@canonical.com> <20130401144225.GC21859@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20130401144225.GC21859@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1420 Lines: 53 On 04/01/2013 10:42 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:52:39PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Hi Piotr, >> >> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel >> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved >> this bug: >> >> commit b83576341664957978e125f5f5db2f15496980b1 >> Author: Piotr Haber >> Date: Wed Nov 28 21:44:09 2012 +0100 >> >> brcmsmac: move PHY functions >> >> The regression was introduced as of v3.8-rc1. The regression still >> exists in v3.9-rc4. >> >> I see that you are the author of this patch, so I wanted to run this >> by you. I was thinking of requesting a revert for v3.9, but I >> wanted to get your feedback first. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Joe >> >> [0] http://pad.lv/1131914 > I recently reverted b6fc28a1, which is the follow-on to that patch. > The revert is _not_ in 3.9-rc5. > > Could you try reverting that patch instead? Does that fix the issue > for you? > > John Hi John, Thanks for the response. Yes, reverting commit b6fc28a1 does resolve this bug. That is the appropriate fix for this issue. Thanks for the assistance. Thanks, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/