Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758934Ab3DAS35 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:29:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:42692 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757250Ab3DAS34 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:29:56 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 3442 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:29:56 EDT Message-ID: <5159D221.70304@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:29:53 -0700 From: John Stultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Ahern CC: Pawel Moll , Stephane Eranian , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , "mingo@elte.hu" , Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Will Deacon , "ak@linux.intel.com" , Pekka Enberg , Steven Rostedt , Robert Richter Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples with kernel samples References: <1350408232.2336.42.camel@laptop> <1359728280.8360.15.camel@hornet> <51118797.9080800@linaro.org> <5123C3AF.8060100@linaro.org> <1361356160.10155.22.camel@laptop> <51285BF1.2090208@linaro.org> <1361801441.4007.40.camel@laptop> <1363291021.3100.144.camel@hornet> <51586315.7080006@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51586315.7080006@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3726 Lines: 80 On 03/31/2013 09:23 AM, David Ahern wrote: > On 3/14/13 1:57 PM, Pawel Moll wrote: >> Ok, how about the code below? I must say I have some doubts about the >> resolution, as there seem to be no generic way of figuring it out for >> the sched_clock (the arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c is actually >> calculating it, but than just prints it out and nothing more). >> >> And, to summarize, we went through 3 ideas: >> >> 1. ioctl() - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1433933 >> 2. syscall - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1437057 >> 3. POSIX clock - below >> >> John also suggested that maybe the perf could use CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW >> instead of local/sched_clock(). > > Any chance a decision can be reached in time for 3.10? Seems like the > simplest option is the perf event based ioctl. I'm still not sold on the CLOCK_PERF posix clock. The semantics are still too hand-wavy and implementation specific. While I'd prefer perf to export some existing semi-sane time domain (using interpolation if necessary), I realize the hardware constraints and performance optimizations make this unlikely (though I'm disappointed I've not seen any attempt or proof point that it won't work). Thus if we must expose this kernel detail to userland, I think we should be careful about how publicly we expose such an interface, as it has the potential for misuse and eventual user-land breakage. So while having a perf specific ioctl is still exposing what I expect will be non-static kernel internal behavior to userland, it at least it exposes it in a less generic fashion, which is preferable to me. The next point of conflict is likely if the ioctl method will be sufficient given performance concerns. Something I'd be interested in hearing about from the folks pushing this. Right now it seems any method is preferable then not having an interface - but I want to make sure that's really true. For example, if the ioctl interface is really too slow, its likely folks will end up using periodic perf ioctl samples and interpolating using normal vdso clock_gettime() timestamps. If that is acceptable, then why not invert the solution and just have perf injecting periodic CLOCK_MONOTONIC timestamps into the log, then have perf report fast, but less-accurate sched_clock deltas from that CLOCK_MONOTONIC boundary. Another alternative that might be a reasonable compromise: have perf register a dynamic posix clock id, which would be a driver specific, less public interface. That would provide the initial method to access the perf time domain. Then when it came time to optimize further, someone would have to sort out the difficulties of creating a vdso method for accessing dynamic posix clocks. It wouldn't be easy, but it wouldn't be impossible to do. > Converting/correlating perf_clock timestamps to time-of-day is a > feature I have been trying to get into perf for over 2 years. This is > a big piece needed for that goal -- along with the xtime tracepoints: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/19/433 I sympathize with how long this process can take. Having maintainers disagree without resolution can be a tar-pit. That said, its only been a few months where this has had proper visibility, and the discussion has paused for months at a time. Despite how long and slow this probably feels, the idea of maintaining a bad interface for the next decade seems much longer. ;) So don't get discouraged yet. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/