Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:29:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:29:31 -0400 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:3991 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 12:29:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:32:20 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Erich Focht , linux-kernel cc: LSE , Ingo Molnar , Michael Hohnbaum Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler Message-ID: <597807912.1032600740@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <595579668.1032598511@[10.10.2.3]> References: <595579668.1032598511@[10.10.2.3]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 613 Lines: 16 > Anyway, I'm giving your code a quick spin ... will give you some > results later ;-) Hmmm .... well I ran the One True Benchmark (tm). The patch *increased* my kernel compile time from about 20s to about 28s. Not sure I like that idea ;-) Anything you'd like tweaked, or more info? Both user and system time were up ... I'll grab a profile of kernel stuff. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/