Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762350Ab3DBVf5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:35:57 -0400 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:58665 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761127Ab3DBVf4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:35:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:35:50 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Benjamin LaHaise , Josh Boyer , Zach Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/33] aio: fix kioctx not being freed after cancellation at exit time Message-ID: <20130402213550.GE5703@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Benjamin LaHaise , Josh Boyer , Zach Brown References: <1363883754-27966-1-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> <1363883754-27966-34-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363883754-27966-34-git-send-email-koverstreet@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1414 Lines: 29 On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > From: Benjamin LaHaise > > The recent changes overhauling fs/aio.c introduced a bug that results in the > kioctx not being freed when outstanding kiocbs are cancelled at exit_aio() > time. Specifically, a kiocb that is cancelled has its completion events > discarded by batch_complete_aio(), which then fails to wake up the process > stuck in free_ioctx(). Fix this by removing the event suppression in > batch_complete_aio() and modify the wait_event() condition in free_ioctx() > appropriately. Once you remove the event suppression, then it means that every single cancelled AIO will result in ki_ctx->reqs_available getting double incremented, right? But reqs_available gets used in more places than just free_ioctx(). It also gets used (for example) by get_reqs_available(), which in turn gets used by aio_get_req() to decide whether or not it's safe to allocate another aio_request. Since reqs_available is getting double allocated, won't we end up allowing more AIO requests to be issued --- more than we would have room in the ring? Am I missing something? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/