Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754428Ab3DBWqL (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:46:11 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33121 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933364Ab3DBWMs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:12:48 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Amit Shah , Asias He , Wanlong Gao , Rusty Russell Subject: [ 085/124] virtio: console: rename cvq_lock to c_ivq_lock Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:11:07 -0700 Message-Id: <20130402221113.952290831@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.rc1.5.g7e0651a In-Reply-To: <20130402221104.163133110@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20130402221104.163133110@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.60-5.1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2913 Lines: 93 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Amit Shah commit 165b1b8bbc17c9469b053bab78b11b7cbce6d161 upstream. The cvq_lock was taken for the c_ivq. Rename the lock to make that obvious. We'll also add a lock around the c_ovq in the next commit, so there's no ambiguity. Signed-off-by: Amit Shah Reviewed-by: Asias He Reviewed-by: Wanlong Gao Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ struct ports_device { spinlock_t ports_lock; /* To protect the vq operations for the control channel */ - spinlock_t cvq_lock; + spinlock_t c_ivq_lock; /* The current config space is stored here */ struct virtio_console_config config; @@ -1715,23 +1715,23 @@ static void control_work_handler(struct portdev = container_of(work, struct ports_device, control_work); vq = portdev->c_ivq; - spin_lock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_lock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); while ((buf = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len))) { - spin_unlock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_unlock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); buf->len = len; buf->offset = 0; handle_control_message(portdev, buf); - spin_lock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_lock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); if (add_inbuf(portdev->c_ivq, buf) < 0) { dev_warn(&portdev->vdev->dev, "Error adding buffer to queue\n"); free_buf(buf, false); } } - spin_unlock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_unlock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); } static void out_intr(struct virtqueue *vq) @@ -1996,10 +1996,11 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_ if (multiport) { unsigned int nr_added_bufs; - spin_lock_init(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_lock_init(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); INIT_WORK(&portdev->control_work, &control_work_handler); - nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->cvq_lock); + nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, + &portdev->c_ivq_lock); if (!nr_added_bufs) { dev_err(&vdev->dev, "Error allocating buffers for control queue\n"); @@ -2150,7 +2151,7 @@ static int virtcons_restore(struct virti return ret; if (use_multiport(portdev)) - fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->cvq_lock); + fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->c_ivq_lock); list_for_each_entry(port, &portdev->ports, list) { port->in_vq = portdev->in_vqs[port->id]; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/