Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763406Ab3DCKNF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:13:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:58101 "EHLO mail-wg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759876Ab3DCKNE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:13:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1364192494-22185-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> From: Michael Kerrisk Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:12:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yCaXJy2cqLjGU9TSdYfH09sWkPU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm: Per process reclaim To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , linux-mm , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Sangseok Lee , Michael Kerrisk-manpages Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 461 Lines: 13 > However, the interface is a quite blunt instrument. Would there be any > virtue in extending it so that an address range could be written to Here, I did mean to say "an *optional* address range. Thanks, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/