Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759268Ab3DCLHG (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:07:06 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:50685 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752552Ab3DCLHD (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:07:03 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar , stratosk Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-next] cpufreq: ondemand: Calculate gradient of CPU load to early increase frequency Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:14:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3060957.HxB12olH3c@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.9.0-rc4+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1072 Lines: 30 On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:13:56 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 3 April 2013 12:01, stratosk wrote: > > I'm sorry, I don't understand. > > The goal of this patch is not energy saving. > > He probably misunderstood it... > > > The goal is to detect CPU load as soon as possible to increase frequency. > > > > Could you please clarify this? > > But he is looking for some numbers to prove your patch. Some numbers > that shows performance is better with your changes... Yes. If the goal of the patch is to improve performance, it would be good to know that it does meet the goal. IOW, *something* is supposed to be better with the patch and if so, numbers in support of this should be provided. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/