Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761880Ab3DCNm3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:42:29 -0400 Received: from co9ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.27]:38013 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759440Ab3DCNm1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:42:27 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.236.101;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BY2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: PS-2(zz98dI936eIzz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h93fhd24hd2bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) From: Matthew Garrett To: Matt Fleming CC: "matt.fleming@intel.com" , "ben@decadent.org.uk" , "jwboyer@redhat.com" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "seth.forshee@canonical.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Determine how much space is used by boot services-only variables Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Determine how much space is used by boot services-only variables Thread-Index: AQHOLuuZAQK+HlxUokuQeY5w6zxM15jEevsAgAAJQ4A= Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:42:13 +0000 Message-ID: <1364996531.19098.3.camel@x230> References: <515150EC.7040203@redhat.com> <1364829240-26475-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <515C29EE.8050008@console-pimps.org> In-Reply-To: <515C29EE.8050008@console-pimps.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.84.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <7EC700C260EFDF49920F59DBB85DF813@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r33DgSwJ028470 Content-Length: 527 Lines: 11 On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 14:09 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > We're fixing a regression in efivars.c, but only for those users that > boot via the EFI boot stub? That seems likely to upset some people. Not really - it just makes the estimates more accurate. Applying (2) without (1) should still fix the functional regression. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?