MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <515C34BF.6060508@gmail.com>
References: <CABPqkBQALeD=iO9x-N0nw+shhqa1kmUaj=sCvx+MvoAPGQ-y9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1350408232.2336.42.camel@laptop>
	<1359728280.8360.15.camel@hornet>
	<CABPqkBSVeU_JP2KpVZLepKDJX=-g6A45Y5MoNphd6+DaU2PQzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<51118797.9080800@linaro.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1302182132230.22263@ionos>
	<5123C3AF.8060100@linaro.org>
	<1361356160.10155.22.camel@laptop>
	<51285BF1.2090208@linaro.org>
	<1361801441.4007.40.camel@laptop>
	<CABPqkBS4TELhoUGrO+moca2fPUoqGjiYCdHJc=H8CjLomPWWDQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1363291021.3100.144.camel@hornet>
	<51586315.7080006@gmail.com>
	<5159D221.70304@linaro.org>
	<515A0A3A.2040105@gmail.com>
	<CABPqkBStMd-VT8aoPhFV-rxiLOrH7h2HtS9O9FBkd+ggd5X+xQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<515C34BF.6060508@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:00:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CABPqkBS_z8zzSn=N_Q+AGbo1kV2EMOoF4dz2Aze=rPNB2n_n2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user samples
 with kernel samples
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
        Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
        "ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1837
Lines: 41

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:55 PM, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/3/13 3:17 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>
>> I haven't done any specific testing with either approach yet. The goal is
>> to
>> use this perf timestamp to correlate user level events to hardware
>> events recorded
>> by the kernel. I would assume there would be situations where those user
>> events
>> could be on the critical path, and thus the timestamp operation would have
>> to be
>> as efficient as possible. The vdso approach would be ideal.
>>
>>>
>>> The performance/speed depends on how often is called. I have no idea what
>>> Stephane's use case is but for me it is to correlate perf_clock
>>> timestamps
>>> to timeofday. In my perf-based daemon that tracks process schedulings, I
>>> update the correlation every 5-10 minutes.
>>>
>> I was more thinking along the lines of runtime environments like Java
>> where
>> a JIT compiler is invoked frequently and you need to correlate samples in
>> the
>> native code with Java source. For that, the JIT compiler has to emit
>> mapping
>> tables which have to be timestamped as address ranges may be re-used.
>
>
> What's the advantage of changing apps -- like the JIT compiler -- to emit
> perf based timestamps versus having perf emit existing timestamps? ie.,
> monotonic and realtime clocks already have vdso mappings for userspace with
> well known performance characteristics. Why not have perf convert its
> perf_clock timestamps into monotonic or realtime when dumping events?
>
Can monotonic timestamps be obtained from NMI context in the kernel?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/