Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762750Ab3DCRRs (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:17:48 -0400 Received: from co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.28]:55472 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762172Ab3DCRRq (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Apr 2013 13:17:46 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.108;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:ausb3twp01.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: VPS-2(zz98dI1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz17326ah8275dhz2dh668h839h944hd25hd2bhf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah1155h) X-WSS-ID: 0MKOW1G-01-4QF-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:17:38 -0500 From: Jacob Shin To: Borislav Petkov , Thomas Renninger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , , , , Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] cpufreq: AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback" powersave bias for ondemand governor Message-ID: <20130403171738.GC17919@jshin-Toonie> References: <1364926304-1799-1-git-send-email-jacob.shin@amd.com> <20130402192352.GC17675@pd.tnic> <20130402200337.GA17919@jshin-Toonie> <2932884.BNCEuERbdR@skinner.arch.suse.de> <20130402210124.GI17675@pd.tnic> <20130403165324.GB17919@jshin-Toonie> <20130403170456.GA4723@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130403170456.GA4723@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1491 Lines: 38 On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:04:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:53:24AM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote: > > Then Thomas, Boris, would it be acceptable if enable the frequency > > feedback feature by default with a sane powersave_bias tunable value? > > And also add proper documentation for both vanila powersave_bias > > and powersave_bias with AMD frequency sensitivity loaded to > > Documentation/cpu-freq/ondemand ? > > Yeah, this was what I was proposing, basically. The only question here > is, would anyone want to disable freq decisions on systems with hw > feedback? If yes, then you'd need to be able to disable the feedback > thing, maybe have a magic value for powersave_bias... Writing 0 to powersave_bias or unloading the AMD driver could do that. When the AMD driver loads, it will give a sane default value to powersave_bias to enable it, when it unloads, it will put it back to 0 > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. > -- > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/