Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763453Ab3DDF3I (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:29:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22422 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763437Ab3DDF3H (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:29:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:58:54 +0530 (IST) From: P J P X-X-Sender: pjp@javelin.pnq.redhat.com To: Jaegeuk Kim cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Matousek Subject: Re: [PATCH] To add NULL pointer check In-Reply-To: <1365034495.4353.14.camel@kjgkr> Message-ID: References: <1364958193.4353.4.camel@kjgkr> <1364975688.4353.7.camel@kjgkr> <1365034495.4353.14.camel@kjgkr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 567 Lines: 15 +-- On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Jaegeuk Kim wrote --+ | Why should we take unnecessary locks and an f2fs_submit_bio call? Yep, we should not. I wasn't sure if these are unnecessary when a_ops->writepage = NULL. Thank you. -- Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Security Response Team DB7A 84C5 D3F9 7CD1 B5EB C939 D048 7860 3655 602B -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/