Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 00:02:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree
Message-Id: <20130404000253.2fc9c75d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130403235634.6bc72c39.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20130404172648.27834d12cbb68338f4b89482@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20130403235634.6bc72c39.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1037
Lines: 23

On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 23:56:34 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 17:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
> > fs/proc/generic.c between several commits from the vfs tree and commit
> > "procfs: improve scaling in proc" from the akpm tree.
> > 
> > I just dropped the akpm tree patch (and the following
> > "procfs-improve-scaling-in-proc-v5") as the conflicts are a bit complex.
> 
> Well perhaps the vfs tree should start paying some attention to the
> rest of the world, particularly after -rc5.

I can't even find this "lift sb_start_write() out of ->write()".  Not on fsdevel,
not on lkml.  What the heck is it and why was it so important?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/