Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:54:20 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:28422 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:54:19 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:38:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Bill Huey cc: Ingo Molnar , Ulrich Drepper , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 In-Reply-To: <20020920215029.GB1527@gnuppy.monkey.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1235 Lines: 30 On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Bill Huey wrote: > Don't remember off hand, but it's like to be several times a second which is > often enough to be a problem especially on large systems with high load. > > The JVM with incremental GC is being targetted for media oriented tasks > using the new NIO, 3d library, etc... slowness in safepoints would cripple it > for these tasks. It's a critical item and not easily address by the current > 1:1 model. Could you comment on how whell this works (or not) with linuxthreads, Solaris, and NGPT? I realize you probably haven't had time to look at NPTL yet. If an N:M model is really better for your application you might be able to just run NGPT. Since preempt threads seem a problem, cound a dedicated machine run w/o preempt? I assume when you say "high load" that you would be talking a server, where performance is critical. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/