Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161564Ab3DENdA (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:33:00 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:49838 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161177Ab3DENc6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:32:58 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Michal Simek Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the xilinx tree Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:32:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-16-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , John Linn References: <20130405153335.baf29606a97b1bee415f3546@canb.auug.org.au> <201304051409.37708.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304051532.46156.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:V0DIFr9YAtYbymqVPFTwpTRWRFtKuK6MSOaU+WLGly8 kmz2aONSj72eJntoackHfkfXkX/wvxaBm4ColurVkfRk7bp6YR WAHGiqlSyv2Zp5yIz6wkMYYlcebKaglEnxNIoW9VwV4zh7d/jP b603xBLUMh515VZVp+YeonMFUok5JI2KmhB94uCCJdpScWyg0d kADh0b5ZFqR5scoNDeBUrgSQ1H0quwg/1kO5RYwW/K7L9SjQzT mL0T9hinhobygNb+q2tG65vQEkD7fMoa4BRplwf6fm2oJU4Mk1 YuJxcS/s16XRluc9DSsPc5KvxnFyMzc8SSAr2eIZ3sqdNYIaMb gXxBslvSGZ+nJoOAixUM= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1360 Lines: 34 On Friday 05 April 2013, Michal Simek wrote: > > > Interesting. I rebased my arm-next branch based on 3.9-rc5 > > > with some Rob's + one Arnd patch from arm-soc - clksrc/cleanup branch. > > > > > > I will fix my arm-next branch. > > > > The for-next branch in arm-soc is not stable, you should never base > > anything on it. If you depend on some stable branch, that is in arm-soc, > > then use just that branch, not one of the next/* branches or for-next. > > > > I haven't based on arm-soc for-next branch my arm-next branch. > I just took all patches I need for zynq and done git rebase v3.5-rc5. > Which caused that I have became commuter of that 4 patches > and there is probably any conflict between your for-next branch and > clksrc/cleanup > which you have resolved in for-next branch. Ah, I see. That was actually my fault, I'm sorry for causing trouble here and then accusing you instead. > And because of my rebase sha1 are different that's why Stephen > had problem with it. > I have changed my arm-next branch and will see on Monday if Stephen > will report any problem or not. Ok, thanks! Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/