Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161939Ab3DEPnH (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:43:07 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:20573 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755664Ab3DEPnF (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:43:05 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+x18KOXQtXLHKbp84EqjGB Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 08:43:00 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Benoit Cousson Cc: Roger Quadros , balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/21] ARM: OMAP2+: Adapt to ehci-omap changes for 3.10 Message-ID: <20130405154259.GZ10155@atomide.com> References: <1363794300-31526-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <515E8B99.8080803@ti.com> <515E9FB1.2040803@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <515E9FB1.2040803@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 47 * Benoit Cousson [130405 03:00]: > On 04/05/2013 10:30 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > > ... > > >> ARM: dts: OMAP4: Add HS USB Host IP nodes > >> ARM: dts: OMAP3: Add HS USB Host IP nodes > >> ARM: dts: omap3-beagle: Add USB Host support > > > > These 3 DTS patches are good to me, but I cannot applied them on top of > > the already existing patches I queued for 3.10. > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git > > for_3.10/dts > > > > Could you rebase these 3 ones only, and I will applied them. > > Mmm, in fact, I've just seen the pull request from Tony :-( > > > Tony, > > Don't you want to remove these DTS patches from the pull-request? Oops sorry :( Looks like I applied them mistakenly as I saved all the patches into a mbox, then applied it. Anyways, too late to start messing with it now. > Otherwise, I will have to rebase the whole DTS series on top of yours. > That being said, if the branch is not supposed to be rebased, it is doable. I pulled in your for_3.10/dts for testing, and to me it looks like it's just overlapping additions. So that should be OK to resolve while pulling it in. It seems there's no need to add omap-for-v3.10/usb as a dependency for your for_3.10/dts unless the conflict gets non-trivial with some additional patches. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/