Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:54:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:54:49 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:35856 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:54:49 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5.38-mm1 From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: Adam Kropelin , lkml In-Reply-To: <3D8E6647.8B02E613@digeo.com> References: <3D8D5F2A.BC057FC4@digeo.com> <20020923004036.GA13921@www.kroptech.com> <3D8E6647.8B02E613@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 22 Sep 2002 20:59:45 -0400 Message-Id: <1032742790.967.997.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 21 On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 20:54, Andrew Morton wrote: > It found a bug. Someone is calling kmem_cache_create() in an > atomic region. Plus I think that during startup, in_atomic() > is (probably incorrectly) returning true. Would you mind doing a printk(KERN_ERR "kmem_cache_create called atomically!\n"); too? I was confused as to what debugging check he was tripping. Yah yah, looking at the trace I should of known, but I didn't know you put a check in there... :) Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/