Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 23:23:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 23:23:28 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:64775 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 23:23:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] gcc3.2 v 2.95.3 (contest and linux-2.5.38) From: Robert Love To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1032750261.3d8e84b5486a9@kolivas.net> References: <1032750261.3d8e84b5486a9@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 22 Sep 2002 23:28:41 -0400 Message-Id: <1032751722.962.1009.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 792 Lines: 21 On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 23:04, Con Kolivas wrote: > I performed contest benchmarks on kernel 2.5.38 when the kernel is compiled with > gcc3.2 to gcc2.95.3 > > warning: The following benchmarks may be disturbing to some viewers: Daniel Jacobowitz, a stunning gcc hacker, suggests you retry with gcc-3.2 from CVS. Apparently some fixes have gone in since 3.2 release. If the problem still occurs, there is either a serious problem in gcc or we have some code that is miscompiled by gcc-3.2 (perhaps not its fault but the kernel's). Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/