Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936062Ab3DHJ4v (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 05:56:51 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:43053 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935953Ab3DHJww (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 05:52:52 -0400 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Amit Shah , Rusty Russell , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 093/102] virtio: console: rename cvq_lock to c_ivq_lock Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:50:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1365414657-29191-94-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1365414657-29191-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1365414657-29191-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3105 Lines: 96 3.5.7.10 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Amit Shah commit 165b1b8bbc17c9469b053bab78b11b7cbce6d161 upstream. The cvq_lock was taken for the c_ivq. Rename the lock to make that obvious. We'll also add a lock around the c_ovq in the next commit, so there's no ambiguity. Signed-off-by: Amit Shah Reviewed-by: Asias He Reviewed-by: Wanlong Gao Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [ luis: adjust context ] Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index f77e341..4c76834 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct ports_device { spinlock_t ports_lock; /* To protect the vq operations for the control channel */ - spinlock_t cvq_lock; + spinlock_t c_ivq_lock; /* The current config space is stored here */ struct virtio_console_config config; @@ -1465,23 +1465,23 @@ static void control_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) portdev = container_of(work, struct ports_device, control_work); vq = portdev->c_ivq; - spin_lock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_lock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); while ((buf = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len))) { - spin_unlock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_unlock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); buf->len = len; buf->offset = 0; handle_control_message(portdev, buf); - spin_lock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_lock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); if (add_inbuf(portdev->c_ivq, buf) < 0) { dev_warn(&portdev->vdev->dev, "Error adding buffer to queue\n"); free_buf(buf); } } - spin_unlock(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_unlock(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); } static void out_intr(struct virtqueue *vq) @@ -1742,10 +1742,11 @@ static int __devinit virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) if (multiport) { unsigned int nr_added_bufs; - spin_lock_init(&portdev->cvq_lock); + spin_lock_init(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); INIT_WORK(&portdev->control_work, &control_work_handler); - nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->cvq_lock); + nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, + &portdev->c_ivq_lock); if (!nr_added_bufs) { dev_err(&vdev->dev, "Error allocating buffers for control queue\n"); @@ -1886,7 +1887,7 @@ static int virtcons_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev) return ret; if (use_multiport(portdev)) - fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->cvq_lock); + fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->c_ivq_lock); list_for_each_entry(port, &portdev->ports, list) { port->in_vq = portdev->in_vqs[port->id]; -- 1.8.1.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/