Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 07:50:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 07:50:01 -0400 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([204.179.120.89]:21963 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 07:50:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:55:10 +0200 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Cc: Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ingo Molnar To: Bill Davidsen From: Peter Waechtler In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <4FBEDDB0-CEEB-11D6-8873-00039387C942@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1026 Lines: 27 Am Montag den, 23. September 2002, um 12:05, schrieb Bill Davidsen: > On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:55:39PM +0200, Peter Waechtler wrote: >>> AIX and Irix deploy M:N - I guess for a good reason: it's more >>> flexible and combine both approaches with easy runtime tuning if >>> the app happens to run on SMP (the uncommon case). >> >> No, AIX and IRIX do it that way because their processes are so bloated >> that it would be unthinkable to do a 1:1 model. > > And BSD? And Solaris? Don't know. I don't have access to all those Unices. I could try FreeBSD. According to http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html Sun is moving to 1:1 and FreeBSD still believes in M:N MacOSX 10.1 does not support PROCESS_SHARED locks, tried that 5 minutes ago. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/