Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935517Ab3DHQ7q (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:59:46 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:5860 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933171Ab3DHQ7p (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:59:45 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Pu4Rnnw3 c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=D9b57V0fl24A:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=CRDVpRx9FpoA:10 a=KKAkSRfTAAAA:8 a=3uuZYXega-OhO66uHTgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=WwgC8nHKvroA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1365440381.25498.22.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] workqueue: Add system wide system_freezable_unbound_wq From: Steven Rostedt To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Amit Kucheria , Tejun Heo , axboe@kernel.dk, Robin Randhawa , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Patch Tracking , Peter Zijlstra , Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lists linaro-kernel , Steve Bannister , airlied@redhat.com, Arvind Chauhan , mingo@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, Charles Garcia-Tobin Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 12:59:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <147bfb5aa81790f94df75858bf20570cbacc9dca.1364740180.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 992 Lines: 24 On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 10:55 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 1 April 2013 10:50, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> This patch adds system wide system_freezable_unbound_wq which will be used by > >> code that currently uses system_freezable_wq and can be moved to unbound > >> workqueues. > > > > _Why_ do i need this change? > > Block layer uses system_freezable_wq for some work and to migrate them to a > UNBOUND wq it was required. Sorry if it is yet not clear. Looks like Amit was left off the patch 0, and missed the power savings explanation that you did there. Perhaps you should have included that in each patch change log. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/