Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:18:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:18:00 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([80.146.160.66]:8071 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:17:59 -0400 Message-ID: <3D8F15B9.4090405@colorfullife.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:23:05 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020408 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Marowsky-Bree CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rhoads, Rob" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux Hardened Device Drivers Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 808 Lines: 22 Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > I fully support the idea to audit the Linux device drivers - using guidelines, > hardware fault injection, stress testing etc - and fixing any potential bugs. > This is obviously a very important task, because the drivers are some of the > most ugly code I've seen in the kernel. > Are there any recipies for stress testing drivers? I have my own list of stress tests I run on my network drivers, but the list is more or less random: http://www.colorfullife.com/~manfred/net-stress/net-stresstest.txt -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/