Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965037Ab3DHVKn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:10:43 -0400 Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:20984 "EHLO g4t0016.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964917Ab3DHVKm (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:10:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1365454703.32127.8.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Support memory hot-delete to boot memory From: Toshi Kani To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, tmac@hp.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, jiang.liu@huawei.com Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:58:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20130408134438.2a4388a07163e10a37158eed@linux-foundation.org> References: <1365440996-30981-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com> <20130408134438.2a4388a07163e10a37158eed@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1475 Lines: 35 On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 13:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:09:53 -0600 Toshi Kani wrote: > > > Memory hot-delete to a memory range present at boot causes an > > error message in __release_region(), such as: > > > > Trying to free nonexistent resource <0000000070000000-0000000077ffffff> > > > > Hot-delete operation still continues since __release_region() is > > a void function, but the target memory range is not freed from > > iomem_resource as the result. This also leads a failure in a > > subsequent hot-add operation to the same memory range since the > > address range is still in-use in iomem_resource. > > > > This problem happens because the granularity of memory resource ranges > > may be different between boot and hot-delete. > > So we don't need this new code if CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n? If so, can > we please arrange for it to not be present if the user doesn't need it? Good point! Yes, since the new function is intended for memory hot-delete and is only called from __remove_pages() in mm/memory_hotplug.c, it should be added as #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG in PATCH 2/3. I will make the change, and send an updated patch to PATCH 2/3. Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/