Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936080Ab3DIInv (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 04:43:51 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:46324 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935524Ab3DIInt (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 04:43:49 -0400 From: "Philip, Avinash" To: "Nori, Sekhar" CC: "linux@arm.linux.org.uk" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com" , "Manjunathappa, Prakash" , "jacmet@sunsite.dk" Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: davinci: da850: add EHRPWM & ECAP DT node Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: davinci: da850: add EHRPWM & ECAP DT node Thread-Index: AQHOKS19PuoEahWsUk2VKlRRhE1ixJjCSvgAgAnS9HD//+hBgIABcNbQ Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:42:27 +0000 Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 08:42:00 +0000 Message-ID: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EAA9DA3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> References: <1364197789-16783-1-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com> <1364197789-16783-4-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com> <515A97DE.1080403@ti.com> <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EAA91B6@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <5162C1A5.5060808@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <5162C1A5.5060808@ti.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.24.162.25] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r398hol8001868 Content-Length: 1031 Lines: 32 On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 18:39:57, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > On 4/8/2013 2:39 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 14:03:34, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > >> On 3/25/2013 1:19 PM, Philip Avinash wrote: > >>> Add da850 EHRPWM & ECAP DT node. > >>> Also adds OF_DEV_AUXDATA for EHRPWM & ECAP driver to use EHRPWM & ECAP > >>> clock. > >> > >> This looks fine to me but I will wait for the bindings to get accepted > >> before taking this one. > > > > Sekhar, > > > > Binding document got accepted in PWM tree [1]. > > Can you accept this patch? > > Can you also add the pinmux definitions and resend just this patch? > Sorry I did not notice those were missing earlier. According to latest schematics, ECAP instance 2 being used for PWM backlight control. Should I add pin-mux only for ECAP2 or for all PWM instances? Thanks Avinash > > Thanks, > Sekhar > ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?