Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:31:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:30:33 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:57224 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:29:28 -0400 Message-ID: <3D8F5C41.35EBE979@digeo.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:24:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: andersen@codepoet.org CC: Con Kolivas , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results References: <1032777021.3d8eed3d55f53@kolivas.net> <20020923124730.GA7556@codepoet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2002 18:24:01.0820 (UTC) FILETIME=[640FD5C0:01C2632E] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 941 Lines: 28 Erik Andersen wrote: > > On Mon Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:21PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Yes you make a very valid point and something I've been stewing over privately > > for some time. contest runs benchmarks in a fixed order with a "priming" compile > > to try and get pagecaches etc back to some sort of baseline (I've been trying > > hard to make the results accurate and repeatable). > > It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were > some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall... > Yes, it would be nice. Unmounting and remounting the test filesystem is usually sufficient. Or you can run main() { memset(malloc(1024*1024*1024), 0, 1024*1024*1024); } a couple of times. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/