Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937095Ab3DJJsl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:48:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29609 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935049Ab3DJJsk (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:48:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:48:28 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Smirnov Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the v4l-dvb tree Message-ID: <20130410064828.6c946ad8@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130410064253.GA4874@zurbaran> References: <20130410134813.b1bff6027f64f14d75d43927@canb.auug.org.au> <20130410064253.GA4874@zurbaran> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1564 Lines: 42 Em Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:42:53 +0200 Samuel Ortiz escreveu: > Hi Stephen, > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:48:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig between commit 3f8ec5df11aa ("[media] mfd: Add header > > files and Kbuild plumbing for SI476x MFD core") from the v4l-dvb tree and > > commit ab85b120e692 ("mfd: Kconfig alphabetical re-ordering") from the > > mfd tree. > I'm surprised the v4l-dvb tree is carrying this patchset because I haven't > ACKed it. Sorry. Not sure why I understood that you gave your ack. Perhaps I miss-read one of the comments of that thread. > I was planning to take the MFD bits of it and provide Mauro a branch > to pull from (Including the mfd/Kconfig change). > Mauro, could we please go that way instead ? This conflict does not look > pretty to me. Sure. Do you have such branch already? As the patches are on my main tree[1], I'll need to either revert them or to do a merge from your branch. The latter is likely a little cleaner, but I'm ok with either ways. Regards, Mauro [1] Currently, we're not using topic branches yet. I'm planning to do it for 3.11. So, once a patch got merged, I can't remove it, as I don't rebase my tree. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/