Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752119Ab3DJJ66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:58:58 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:57137 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806Ab3DJJ64 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:58:56 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,445,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="284187213" Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:58:52 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Smirnov Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the v4l-dvb tree Message-ID: <20130410095852.GB4874@zurbaran> References: <20130410134813.b1bff6027f64f14d75d43927@canb.auug.org.au> <20130410064253.GA4874@zurbaran> <20130410064828.6c946ad8@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130410064828.6c946ad8@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1810 Lines: 47 Hi Mauro, On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:48:28AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:42:53 +0200 > Samuel Ortiz escreveu: > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:48:13PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in > > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig between commit 3f8ec5df11aa ("[media] mfd: Add header > > > files and Kbuild plumbing for SI476x MFD core") from the v4l-dvb tree and > > > commit ab85b120e692 ("mfd: Kconfig alphabetical re-ordering") from the > > > mfd tree. > > I'm surprised the v4l-dvb tree is carrying this patchset because I haven't > > ACKed it. > > Sorry. Not sure why I understood that you gave your ack. Perhaps I miss-read > one of the comments of that thread. No worries, really. This has been a long thread... > > I was planning to take the MFD bits of it and provide Mauro a branch > > to pull from (Including the mfd/Kconfig change). > > Mauro, could we please go that way instead ? This conflict does not look > > pretty to me. > > Sure. Do you have such branch already? As the patches are on my main > tree[1], I don't have it yet. I asked Andrei to add a header to one of the MFD patches because his patchset is currently not bisectable (The MFD patches include a media/ header that is created later in the patchset). Once he has that done, I'll create a branch for you to merge. I'll let you know when that's ready. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/